Luminous Silk Foundation 5.8 dupes and alternatives Armani Beauty
Medium light · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Filters, 3 applied
Formulation
- Liquid0
- Cushion0
- Serum1
Preferences
Avoid an ingredient
- Dimethicone0
- Fragrance2
- Alcohol denat.1
- Talc2
- Silicones0
- Coconut oil2
SortSort byOverall match
2 of 32 matches
Only showing matches made for sensitive skin, with medium coverage, with a natural finish.
- 1 match has no skin type listed and is not shown.
Closest shade match: L'Oréal Paris Age Perfect Radiant Serum Foundation Golden Honey
The equivalent shade: scored on colour, depth and undertone only.

5.8Change shade
- Shade match
- 94out of 100
- Colour
- 91
- Depth
- 100
- Undertone
- 100
Your shade $69 at Sephora
Where to buy Golden Honey
L'Oréal Paris Age Perfect Radiant Serum Foundation
Every store that sells this shade · prices as last checked
Closest overall alternative: Maybelline Instant Age Rewind Eraser Treatment Foundation 310
The most similar foundation overall: shade match 55%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, skin suitability 5%.

5.8Change shade
- Overall match
- 84out of 100
- Shade (Shade match)
- 90
- Finish (Finish & visual result)
- 100
- Wear (Wear & performance)
- 65
- Skin (Skin suitability)
- 0
Your shade $69 at Sephora
Where to buy 310
Maybelline Instant Age Rewind Eraser Treatment Foundation
Every store that sells this shade · prices as last checked
Looking for a concealer in your shade?
The closest shade to Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Foundation 5.8 (Medium light · Warm · golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
From the same range

5.5
Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer, shade 5.5
- Close colour
- Medium light · Warm · peach undertone
$42
Closest concealers

2Y36
Make Up For Ever HD Skin Full Cover Multi-Use Waterproof Concealer, shade 2Y36
- Very close colour
- Medium light · Warm · golden undertone
$35
WN 98 Cream Caramel
Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser, shade WN 98 Cream Caramel
- Very close colour
- Medium light · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
$22
NC40
MAC Cosmetics Studio Fix 36HR Smooth Angles Hydrating Concealer, shade NC40
- Very close colour
- Medium light · Warm · golden undertone
$30
Medium Tan 3.5W
bareMinerals ORIGINAL Liquid Mineral Brightening Concealer, shade Medium Tan 3.5W
- Very close colour
- Medium light · Warm · golden undertone
$31
Dune 7.5
Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer, shade Dune 7.5
- Very close colour
- Medium light · Warm · golden undertone
$39
8.5 Medium-Tan
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Long-Wear Blur Concealer, shade 8.5 Medium-Tan
- Close colour
- Light medium · Warm undertone
$36
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris Age Perfect Radiant Serum Foundation in Golden Honey, against Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Foundation in 5.8. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
If you switch
To L'Oréal Paris Age Perfect Radiant Serum Foundation in Golden Honey.
Same or better
- $54.03 less
- Very close colour
- Same warm undertone
- Same natural finish
- Same medium coverage
- Both claim not settling into lines
- Both claim a lightweight feel
- No fragrance listed
- Adds SPF 50
Different
- No blurring effect claimed
- No long-wear claim
- Does not claim transfer resistance
- Not marketed for normal/dry/oily skin
Ingredients (information only, not scored)
11 shared ingredients; weighted similarity 18%. Ingredients only affect results through the filters.
Why the closest overall alternative works
Maybelline Instant Age Rewind Eraser Treatment Foundation in 310, against Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Foundation in 5.8. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
If you switch
To Maybelline Instant Age Rewind Eraser Treatment Foundation in 310.
Same or better
- $56.02 less
- Very close colour
- Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)
- Same natural finish
- Same medium coverage
- Both claim a blurring effect
- Both claim not settling into lines
- Both claim a lightweight feel
- No fragrance listed
- No drying alcohol listed
- Adds SPF 20
Different
- No long-wear claim
- Does not claim transfer resistance
- Not marketed for normal/dry/oily skin
Ingredients (information only, not scored)
7 shared ingredients; weighted similarity 8%. Ingredients only affect results through the filters.
Where to buy
Closest shade match
L'Oréal Paris Age Perfect Radiant Serum Foundation Golden Honey
Your shade $69 at Sephora
Closest overall alternative
Maybelline Instant Age Rewind Eraser Treatment Foundation 310
Your shade $69 at Sephora
How these matches are scored
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.