ORIGINAL Liquid Mineral Brightening Concealer Light 2C dupes and alternatives bareMinerals
4.3 (1,273)·Light medium · Cool · pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: very fair with a golden undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Described as light medium, yours as very fair· Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than luminous finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as light medium, yours as very fair · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage
Retailer shade note: light medium with warm peach undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light medium, yours as very fair
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Described as light medium, yours as very fair· Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than luminous finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as light medium, yours as very fair · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage
Retailer shade note: light medium with warm olive undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light medium, yours as very fair
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Described as medium, yours as very fair· Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than luminous finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as very fair · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral peach undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as very fair
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Described as medium, yours as very fair· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than luminous finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as very fair · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral beige undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as very fair
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Described as light, yours as very fair· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Described as light, yours as very fair · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertone
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light, yours as very fair
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Described as light, yours as very fair· Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than luminous finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as light, yours as very fair · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: light with golden undertone
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light, yours as very fair
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Described as light, yours as very fair· Radiant rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as light, yours as very fair · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: light with pink undertone
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light, yours as very fair
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Described as medium, yours as very fair· Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than luminous finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as very fair · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: M2 - medium with warm undertones, and a golden tone
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as very fair
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Described as medium, yours as very fair· Natural rather than luminous finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
60
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Described as medium, yours as very fair · Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Described as medium, yours as very fair· Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
60
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as very fair · Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
The closest shade to bareMinerals ORIGINAL Liquid Mineral Brightening Concealer Light 2C (Light medium · Cool · pink undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
NYX Professional Makeup Bare With Me Hydrating Face & Body Concealer Serum in Beige, against bareMinerals ORIGINAL Liquid Mineral Brightening Concealer in Light 2C. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLight 2CClosest shade matchBeigeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%96#e2b28a#e2b28eLooks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared59
Finish35%34LuminousNaturalDifferentNatural finish rather than luminous
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared72
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 77/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer in 2, against bareMinerals ORIGINAL Liquid Mineral Brightening Concealer in Light 2C. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLight 2CClosest overall alternative2How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%95#e2b28a#ddb28dLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Finish35%78LuminousRadiantCloseRadiant finish rather than luminous
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $11 more
