Beautler.Your beauty butler

Airbrush Flawless Long-Wear Blur Concealer 14 Deep dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury

Deep tan · Cool undertone

Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).

Only showing matches without talc or silicones.

Closest shade match: Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer 11.75

The equivalent shade: scored on colour, depth and undertone only.

The match
Armani Beauty
11.75
Depth and undertone: Deep tan · Cool · pink
Finish and coverage: Radiant · Medium coverage
Shade match
86out of 100
Colour
78
Depth
97
Undertone
100
Medium confidence· Digital matchWhy it matches
Best price
$42SephoraSephora
Costs $6 more

Your shade $36 at Sephora

Closest overall alternative: Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer 6.5 Neutral

The most similar concealer overall: shade match 55%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, skin suitability 5%.

The match
Dior
6.5 Neutral
Depth and undertone: Deep tan · Neutral
Finish and coverage: Natural · Full coverage
Overall match
75out of 100
Shade (Shade match)
78
Finish (Finish & visual result)
70
Wear (Wear & performance)
83
Skin (Skin suitability)
33
Best price
$42SephoraSephora
Costs $6 more

Your shade $36 at Sephora

SephoraView at Sephora

More matches

Show
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.

Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.

  1. Shade match 69
    $30Ulta BeautyUlta Beauty(product price)$6 less (17%)

    Matches: Same full coverageBoth claim not settling into lines

    Differences: Slightly warmer undertoneNatural rather than matte finishNo blurring effect claimed

    Score details
    Shade match
    69
    Finish & visual result
    70
    Wear & performance
    70
    Skin suitability
    84

    Close colour · Natural · Full coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance

    Retailer shade note: for warm undertones

    Medium confidence· Digital match

    View match
  2. Shade match 67
    $42SephoraSephoraCosts $6 more

    Matches: Same full coverageBoth claim 24-hour wearBoth claim transfer resistance

    Differences: Slightly deeperNeutral rather than cool undertoneNatural rather than matte finish

    Score details
    Shade match
    67
    Finish & visual result
    70
    Wear & performance
    83
    Skin suitability
    33

    Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance

    Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones

    Medium confidence· Digital match

    View match

Looking for a foundation in your shade?

The closest shade to Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Long-Wear Blur Concealer 14 Deep (Deep tan · Cool undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.

From the same range

  1. Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Foundation

    13 Neutral

    Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Foundation, shade 13 Neutral

    • Close colour
    • Deep · Neutral undertone

    $52

Closest foundations

  1. MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Serum Powered Foundation

    NW48

    MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Serum Powered Foundation, shade NW48

    • Looks identical
    • Deep tan · Cool undertone

    $46

  2. Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium Coverage Foundation

    14 Cool

    Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium Coverage Foundation, shade 14 Cool

    • Very close colour
    • Deep tan · Cool · rosy undertone

    $52

  3. Tarte Face Tape Full Coverage Foundation

    53N Deep Neutral

    Tarte Face Tape Full Coverage Foundation, shade 53N Deep Neutral

    • Very close colour
    • Deep tan · Cool undertone

    $42

  4. bareMinerals Original Pure Serum Radiant Natural Liquid Foundation Mineral SPF 20

    Deep Cool 5

    bareMinerals Original Pure Serum Radiant Natural Liquid Foundation Mineral SPF 20, shade Deep Cool 5

    • Very close colour
    • Deep tan · Cool undertone

    $22

  5. Sephora Collection Best Skin Ever Matte Powder Foundation

    56.5P Deep

    Sephora Collection Best Skin Ever Matte Powder Foundation, shade 56.5P Deep

    • Very close colour
    • Deep tan · Cool · pink undertone

    $24

  6. Chanel ULTRA LE TEINT Ultrawear All-Day Comfort Flawless Finish Foundation

    BR132

    Chanel ULTRA LE TEINT Ultrawear All-Day Comfort Flawless Finish Foundation, shade BR132

    • Very close colour
    • Deep tan · Cool undertone

    $69

Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.

Why the closest shade match works

Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer in 11.75, against Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Long-Wear Blur Concealer in 14 Deep. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.

ComparedYour shade14 DeepClosest shade match11.75Score
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour78#a76748#9b6852Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth97Deep tanDeep tanSameDepth difference: 1.6
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Undertone100CoolCool · pinkClosefrom retailer shade descriptions
Finish & visual result25% of overall45
Finish12MatteRadiantDifferentRadiant finish rather than matte
Coverage60FullMediumSome differenceMedium coverage rather than full
Skin-like finish40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared51
Longevity7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stabilitynot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type50Normal, dry, oilyNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 69/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match

Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.

How scoring works

If you switch

To Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer in 11.75.

Same or better

  • Same cool undertone
  • Claims a skin-like finish
  • Both claim a blurring effect
  • Claims a lightweight feel

Different

  • Small colour difference on the swatch
  • Radiant finish instead of matte
  • Medium rather than full coverage
  • Does not claim transfer resistance
  • Does not claim not settling into lines

Ingredients (information only, not scored)

5 shared ingredients; weighted similarity 5%. Ingredients only affect results through the filters.

AttributeYour shadeClosest shade match
Basehigh siliconelow silicone
FragranceNot listedNot listed
Drying alcoholNot listedNot listed
SPFNot listedNot listed
OverlapBoth unknown-based; silicone high vs low

Why the closest overall alternative works

Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer in 6.5 Neutral, against Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Long-Wear Blur Concealer in 14 Deep. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.

ComparedYour shade14 DeepClosest overall alternative6.5 NeutralScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour80#a76748#b4673eClose colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth96Deep tanDeep tanSameDepth difference: 2.3
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Undertone65CoolNeutralSome differencefrom retailer shade descriptions
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared70
Finish56MatteNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than matte
Coverage100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finishnot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared83
Longevity10024-hour wear24-hour wearSameBoth claim 24-hour wear
Transfer resistance100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stabilitynot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfortnot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall33
Skin type33Normal, dry, oilyNormalBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 75/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match

Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.

How scoring works

If you switch

To Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer in 6.5 Neutral.

Same or better

  • Same full coverage
  • Both claim 24-hour wear
  • Both claim transfer resistance

Different

  • Small colour difference on the swatch
  • Neutral rather than cool undertone
  • Natural finish instead of matte
  • No blurring effect claimed
  • Does not claim not settling into lines
  • Not marketed for dry/oily skin
  • Fragrance is listed in the formula

Ingredients (information only, not scored)

8 shared ingredients; weighted similarity 8%. Ingredients only affect results through the filters.

AttributeYour shadeClosest overall alternative
Basehigh siliconemoderate silicone
FragranceNot listedListed (fragrance)
Drying alcoholNot listedNot listed
SPFNot listedNot listed
OverlapBoth unknown-based; silicone high vs moderate

Where to buy

Closest shade match

Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer 11.75

Best price
$42SephoraSephora
Costs $6 more

Your shade $36 at Sephora

Closest overall alternative

Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer 6.5 Neutral

Best price
$42SephoraSephora
Costs $6 more

Your shade $36 at Sephora

SephoraView at Sephora

How these matches are scored

31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.

Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.