Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser WN 115.5 Mocha dupes and alternatives Clinique
4.0 (1,308)·Medium tan · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (64%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Satin rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Satin rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: deep with rosy cool undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with warm, golden undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (64%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Satin rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Satin rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: deep with rosy cool undertones
The closest shade to Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser WN 115.5 Mocha (Medium tan · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
IT Cosmetics Bye Bye Under Eye Full Coverage Anti-Aging Water-Resistant Concealer in 40.0 Deep Tan, against Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in WN 115.5 Mocha. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWN 115.5 MochaClosest match40.0 Deep TanHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%92#bf8766#bf8c6aVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Overall match 83/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $16 more
