Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser WN 48 Oat dupes and alternatives Clinique
4.0 (1,308)·Fair · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (64%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Satin rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Satin rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium tan with warm undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: Medium with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: Medium Tan with neutral undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with warm, golden undertones
The closest shade to Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser WN 48 Oat (Fair · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
e.l.f. Cosmetics 16HR Camo Concealer in Medium Warm, against Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in WN 48 Oat. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWN 48 OatClosest shade matchMedium WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall75
Colour60%69#f0c78f#ebb672Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.1 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared55
Finish35%56NaturalMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%60MediumFullSome differenceFull coverage rather than medium
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, oilyOily, combination, normalBoth marketed for normal/oily skin
Overall match 68/100Shade match 75/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
IT Cosmetics Bye Bye Under Eye Full Coverage Anti-Aging Water-Resistant Concealer in 14.0 Light Tan, against Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in WN 48 Oat. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWN 48 OatClosest overall alternative14.0 Light TanHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall71
Colour60%61#f0c78f#e1bc99Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%86FairLightCloseDepth difference: 5.7
Retailer descriptionMediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 72/100Shade match 71/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $16 more
