Kamo Triple-Peptide Multi-Use Serum Foundation Deep 18W dupes and alternatives Drunk Elephant
4.8 (753)·Deep tan · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Very deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with warm, peach undertones
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$26 less (62%)4.3 (699)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim transfer resistance· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
56
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
$39.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$2.50 less (6%)4.6 (919)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: for deep neutral skin with a peach hue
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal skin
Retailer shade note: extra deep with neutral brown undertones
$38Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (10%)4.4 (657)
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral, subtle warm undertones
The closest shade to Drunk Elephant Kamo Triple-Peptide Multi-Use Serum Foundation Deep 18W (Deep tan · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Sephora Collection Microsmooth Multi-Tasking Baked Face Powder Foundation in 65 Toffee, against Drunk Elephant Kamo Triple-Peptide Multi-Use Serum Foundation in Deep 18W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep 18WClosest shade match65 ToffeeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#a66248#a66140Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%20FullLightDifferentLight coverage rather than full
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, oilyNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/oily skin
Overall match 74/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Lawless Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation in 27D, against Drunk Elephant Kamo Triple-Peptide Multi-Use Serum Foundation in Deep 18W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep 18WClosest overall alternative27DHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%90#a66248#9e6246Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall28
Skin type100%28Normal, dry, oilyCombination, oily, sensitiveBoth marketed for oily skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautySame price
