16HR Camo Concealer Medium Peach dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.2 (5,664)·Fair · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as light, yours as medium· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
77
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as light, yours as medium · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: L2.3 - Light with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light, yours as medium
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as very fair, yours as medium· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
77
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as very fair, yours as medium · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: L2 - Very light with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as very fair, yours as medium
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics 16HR Camo Concealer Medium Peach (Fair · Warm · peach undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer in 330 Bisque N, against e.l.f. Cosmetics 16HR Camo Concealer in Medium Peach. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium PeachClosest match330 Bisque NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%82#e3cebd#e1c7aeClose colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94FairFairSameDepth difference: 3.2
Retailer descriptionMediumMediumBoth described as mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared74
Finish35%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Coverage30%60FullMediumSome differenceMedium coverage rather than full
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%6016-hour wear24-hour wearSome difference24-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall28
Skin type100%28Oily, combination, normalDry, combination, sensitiveBoth marketed for combination skin
Overall match 81/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $24 more
