Hydrating Camo Concealer Deep Caramel dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (8,153)·Medium · Cool · rosy undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than satin finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than satin finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral olive undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than satin finish
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: tan to deep with a golden undertone
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer Deep Caramel (Medium · Cool · rosy undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in CN 116 Spice, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Deep Caramel. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep CaramelClosest matchCN 116 SpiceHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%85#d19269#ca8a5bVery close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared64
Finish35%78SatinNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than satin
Coverage30%60FullMediumSome differenceMedium coverage rather than full
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Dry, combination, normalNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for dry/normal skin
Overall match 79/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $4 more
