Hydrating Camo Concealer Deep Chestnut dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (8,153)·Medium light · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
No match is close enough in colour to recommend as an overall alternative (shade match under 70).
More matches
Show
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as light, yours as deep· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as light, yours as deep · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Luminous rather than satin finish · Buildable rather than full coverage
Retailer shade note: for light neutral skin with peach undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light, yours as deep
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Described as medium tan, yours as deep· Slightly cooler undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Described as medium tan, yours as deep · Slightly cooler undertone · Luminous rather than satin finish · Buildable rather than full coverage
Retailer shade note: for medium-tan cool skin with rosy undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as deep
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as deep· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Luminous rather than satin finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as deep · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Luminous rather than satin finish · Buildable rather than full coverage
Retailer shade note: for medium-tan neutral skin with peach undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as deep
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer Deep Chestnut (Medium light · Warm · golden undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
bareMinerals ORIGINAL Liquid Mineral Brightening Concealer in Medium Tan 3.5W, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Deep Chestnut. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep ChestnutClosest shade matchMedium Tan 3.5WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall40
Colour60%87#e1a36d#dca872Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared67
Finish35%56SatinLuminousSome differenceLuminous finish rather than satin
Coverage30%80FullBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Dry, combination, normalNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 56/100Shade match 40/100Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as deep
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $23 more
View at Walmart
View at Sephora
