Hydrating Camo Concealer Deep Chestnut dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (8,153)·Medium light · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Natural rather than satin finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than satin finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/combination/normal skin
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Described as medium tan, yours as deep· Olive rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Described as medium tan, yours as deep · Olive rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage
Retailer shade note: medium tan with warm olive undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as deep
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Described as medium, yours as deep· Olive rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Described as medium, yours as deep · Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than satin finish · Buildable rather than full coverage
Retailer shade note: medium with olive undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as deep
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Described as medium, yours as deep· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Described as medium, yours as deep · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than satin finish · Buildable rather than full coverage
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as deep
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as light, yours as deep· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as light, yours as deep · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Luminous rather than satin finish · Buildable rather than full coverage
Retailer shade note: for light neutral skin with peach undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light, yours as deep
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Described as medium tan, yours as deep· Slightly cooler undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Described as medium tan, yours as deep · Slightly cooler undertone · Luminous rather than satin finish · Buildable rather than full coverage
Retailer shade note: for medium-tan cool skin with rosy undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as deep
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as deep· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Luminous rather than satin finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as deep · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Luminous rather than satin finish · Buildable rather than full coverage
Retailer shade note: for medium-tan neutral skin with peach undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as deep
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer Deep Chestnut (Medium light · Warm · golden undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Maybelline Fit Me Natural Finish Concealer in 030 Honey, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Deep Chestnut. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep ChestnutClosest match030 HoneyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%86#e1a36d#eeaa75Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 4 compared78
Finish35%78SatinNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than satin
Coverage30%—not comparableFullNot listedNot comparedCoverage not listed for one product
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0Dry, combination, normalSensitiveMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 77/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $4 more
Sephora
View at Walmart
