Hydrating Camo Concealer Deep Cinnamon dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (8,153)·Medium · Cool · rosy undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than satin finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than satin finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than satin finish· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
60
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than satin finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than satin finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
60
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than satin finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than satin finish
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than satin finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer Deep Cinnamon (Medium · Cool · rosy undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
CoverGirl TruBlend Undercover Concealer in Golden Amber, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Deep Cinnamon. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep CinnamonClosest matchGolden AmberHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour60%98#c6916f#c8906eLooks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 0.1
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared65
Finish35%34SatinMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than satin
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Dry, combination, normalNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 73/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $4.99 more
Sephora
