Beautler.Your beauty butler

Hydrating Camo Concealer Tan Sand dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics

Light · Olive undertone

Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).

Filters, 2 applied

Finish

Formulation

  • Liquid0
  • Cream0
  • Serum0

Skin type

Preferences

Fragrance-free0No drying alcohol3Vegan0Cruelty-free0Oil-free0With SPF0Mineral3
Sort

3 of 30

Only showing matches with medium to full coverage, without talc.

  • 4 matches have no coverage listed and are not shown.

Closest shade matchClosest overall alternative: Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer 11.75 Tan

The equivalent shade and the most similar concealer overall.

The match
Charlotte Tilbury
11.75 Tan
Depth and undertone: Light · Olive · neutral olive
Finish and coverage: Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Overall match
79out of 100
Shade (Shade match)
87
Finish (Finish & visual result)
70
Wear (Wear & performance)
68
Skin (Skin suitability)
67
Shade match
87out of 100
Colour
78
Depth
99
Undertone
100
Medium confidence· Digital matchWhy it matches
Match price
$36Ulta BeautyUlta Beauty
Costs $28 more

Your shade $8 at Ulta Beauty · product price; shade not separately priced

More matches

Show
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.

Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.

  1. Shade match 86
    $36Ulta BeautyUlta Beauty(product price)Costs $28 more

    Matches: Very close colourClaims a skin-like finishBoth claim a lightweight feel

    Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertoneRadiant rather than satin finishMedium-full rather than full coverage

    Score details
    Shade match
    86
    Finish & visual result
    70
    Wear & performance
    68
    Skin suitability
    67

    Very close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance

    Retailer shade note: tan with neutral/golden undertones

    Medium confidence· Digital match

    View match
  2. Shade match 85
    $36Ulta BeautyUlta BeautyCosts $28 more

    Matches: Very close colourClaims a skin-like finishBoth claim a lightweight feel

    Differences: Slightly warmer undertoneRadiant rather than satin finishMedium-full rather than full coverage

    Score details
    Shade match
    85
    Finish & visual result
    70
    Wear & performance
    68
    Skin suitability
    67

    Very close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance

    Retailer shade note: tan with golden undertones

    Medium confidence· Digital match

    View match

Looking for a foundation in your shade?

The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer Tan Sand (Light · Olive undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.

From the same range

  1. e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30

    Tan 400 W

    e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30, shade Tan 400 W

    • Nearest in this range
    • Tan · Warm undertone

    $16

Closest foundations

  1. Rare Beauty True to Myself Natural Matte Longwear Foundation

    18 Light Medium Neutral

    Rare Beauty True to Myself Natural Matte Longwear Foundation, shade 18 Light Medium Neutral

    • Very close colour
    • Light medium · Olive · neutral olive undertone

    $38

  2. Maybelline Fit Me Dewy + Smooth Foundation

    230 Natural Buff

    Maybelline Fit Me Dewy + Smooth Foundation, shade 230 Natural Buff

    • Looks identical
    • Light · Neutral · neutral golden undertone

    $9.12

  3. J.Cat Beauty Aquasurance Compact Foundation

    Buff

    J.Cat Beauty Aquasurance Compact Foundation, shade Buff

    • Looks identical
    • Light · Neutral · neutral golden undertone

    $15.99

  4. J.Cat Beauty Perfextion Long Wearing Foundation

    Vanilla Bean

    J.Cat Beauty Perfextion Long Wearing Foundation, shade Vanilla Bean

    • Looks identical
    • Light · Neutral · neutral golden undertone

    $3.89

  5. Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Soft Matte Longwear Foundation

    225

    Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Soft Matte Longwear Foundation, shade 225

    • Close colour
    • Light · Olive · neutral olive undertone

    $40

  6. Tarte Timeless Hydrating Foundation

    35H Medium Honey

    Tarte Timeless Hydrating Foundation, shade 35H Medium Honey

    • Looks identical
    • Light · Warm undertone

    $42

Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.

Why the closest match works

Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer in 11.75 Tan, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Tan Sand. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.

ComparedYour shadeTan SandClosest match11.75 TanScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour78#f4b786#ffb173Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth99LightLightSameDepth difference: 0.7
Retailer descriptionTanTanBoth described as tanThe retailers describe the same depth
Undertone100OliveOlive · neutral oliveClosefrom retailer shade descriptions
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared70
Finish78SatinRadiantCloseRadiant finish rather than satin
Coverage80FullMedium-fullCloseMedium-full coverage rather than full
Skin-like finish40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurringnot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistancenot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stabilitynot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall67
Skin type67Dry, combination, normalDry, normalBoth marketed for dry/​normal skin
Overall match 79/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match

Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.

How scoring works

If you switch

To Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer in 11.75 Tan.

Same or better

  • Same olive undertone
  • Radiant finish instead of satin
  • Medium-full rather than full coverage
  • Claims a skin-like finish
  • Both claim a lightweight feel

Different

  • Small colour difference on the swatch
  • Does not claim not settling into lines
  • Not marketed for combination skin
  • Fragrance is listed in the formula

Ingredients (information only, not scored)

3 shared ingredients; weighted similarity 6%. Ingredients only affect results through the filters.

AttributeYour shadeClosest match
BaseWater-based, high siliconeWater-based, no silicone
FragranceNot listedListed (fragrance)
Drying alcoholNot listedNot listed
SPFNot listedNot listed
OverlapBoth water-based; silicone high vs none

Where to buy 11.75 Tan

Match price
$36Ulta BeautyUlta Beauty
Costs $28 more

Your shade $8 at Ulta Beauty · product price; shade not separately priced

How these matches are scored

30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.

Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.