Soft Glam Satin Foundation 61 Rich Cool dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.5 (40,486)·Rich deep · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
75
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Ultra Rich skin with neutral-olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Light rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
46
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Soft Glam Satin Foundation 61 Rich Cool (Rich deep · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
IT Cosmetics CC+ Cream Full Coverage Color Correcting Foundation in Deep Mocha, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Soft Glam Satin Foundation in 61 Rich Cool. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade61 Rich CoolClosest matchDeep MochaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#5a3424#562f20Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 90/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $47 more
