Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick 14 dupes and alternatives Fenty Beauty
4.3 (1,119)·Medium tan · Olive · warm olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same olive undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: MD3.5 - medium-deep to deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: MD2.3 - medium-deep with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same light coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium-tan with neutral undertones
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (38%)4.2 (812)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral undertones
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$24 less (60%)4.0 (94)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for medium to tan skin with neutral undertones
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$24 less (60%)4.0 (94)
Matches: Very close colour· Same olive undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Light-medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Light-medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Light-medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Same light coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$26 less (65%)3.5 (10)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium or tan skin tones with a yellow undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same light coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium-tan with a neutral undertone
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$26 less (65%)3.5 (10)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium or tan skin tones with a warm red undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same light coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: MEDIUM TO TAN WITH WARM PEACH UNDERTONES
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$24.01 less (60%)4.5 (1,466)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium-deep with warm undertones
$39Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (3%)4.3 (1,754)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Warm rather than olive undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Warm rather than olive undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
The closest shade to Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick 14 (Medium tan · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Well People Supernatural Complexion Stick in 30 Medium Tan Warm, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick in 14. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade14Closest shade match30 Medium Tan WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%98#cb8952#c98a55Looks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 80/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
m.ph by Mary Phillips Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation in Medium 170 G, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick in 14. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade14Closest overall alternativeMedium 170 GHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%96#cb8952#c68851Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%80LightMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall70
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, combinationSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $9 more
