Stretch Concealer for Dewy Buildable Coverage Light 3 dupes and alternatives Glossier
4.2 (666)·Very fair · Olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
No match is close enough in colour to recommend as an overall alternative (shade match under 70).
More matches
Show
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (64%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage
Retailer shade note: light with golden beige undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage
Retailer shade note: very light with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage
Retailer shade note: very light with golden undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage
The closest shade to Glossier Stretch Concealer for Dewy Buildable Coverage Light 3 (Very fair · Olive undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Rare Beauty Liquid Touch Brightening Concealer in 230N, against Glossier Stretch Concealer for Dewy Buildable Coverage in Light 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLight 3Closest shade match230NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall67
Colour60%54#fed697#e6be90Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.9 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared86
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedOily, dry, combination, normalSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 67/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $9 more
View at Target
