Stretch Concealer for Dewy Buildable Coverage Very Deep 4 dupes and alternatives Glossier
4.2 (666)·Rich deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
No match is close enough in colour to recommend as an overall alternative (shade match under 70).
More matches
Show
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: deepest with rich neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral rich-brown undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: Deep with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: extra rich skin tones with red undertones
The closest shade to Glossier Stretch Concealer for Dewy Buildable Coverage Very Deep 4 (Rich deep · Neutral undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Long-Wear Blur Concealer in 17 Deep, against Glossier Stretch Concealer for Dewy Buildable Coverage in Very Deep 4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeVery Deep 4Closest shade match17 DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall68
Colour60%47#3f2c10#432b1eSlight colour differenceColour difference 7.8 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared43
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%80BuildableFullCloseFull coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared65
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, oilySkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 60/100Shade match 68/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $12 more
View at Walmart
