Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage Deep 2 dupes and alternatives Glossier
4.1 (490)·Deep · Olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Ranked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
68
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Both claim 12-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims colour stability
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
68
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
The closest shade to Glossier Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage Deep 2 (Deep · Olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Tower 28 Beauty Swipe Serum Non-Acnegenic Foundation in 19.5O Tahoe, against Glossier Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage in Deep 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep 2Closest match19.5O TahoeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%67#78552b#704e33Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 4.0
Retailer descriptionNot statedRich deepNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared68
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared72
Longevity30%8012-hour wear16-hour wearClose16-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100SensitiveSensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 76/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.