Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage Medium 2 dupes and alternatives Glossier
4.1 (490)·Light · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines· Not marketed for sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for light skin with warm undertones
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$22.01 less (65%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to Glossier Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage Medium 2 (Light · Warm · peach undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Foundation in 3.8, against Glossier Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage in Medium 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium 2Closest shade match3.8How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#edba87#eab987Looks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference: 0.7
Retailer descriptionNot statedLightNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared63
Longevity30%3512-hour wear24-hour wearDifferent24-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0SensitiveNormal, dry, oilyMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 84/100Shade match 99/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
m.ph by Mary Phillips Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation in Fair 10 G, against Glossier Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage in Medium 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium 2Closest overall alternativeFair 10 GHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%91#edba87#e9bd91Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference: 0.8
Retailer descriptionNot statedFairNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared100
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared86
Longevity30%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0SensitiveNormal, dry, combinationMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 90/100Shade match 95/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $4 more
