Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage Very Deep 2 dupes and alternatives Glossier
4.1 (490)·Very deep · Olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
No match is close enough in colour to recommend as an overall alternative (shade match under 70).
More matches
Show
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same olive undertone· Same medium coverage· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
68
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than olive undertone
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same olive undertone· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Same olive undertone· Same medium coverage· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
38
Skin suitability
68
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: dark skin with neutral beige undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than olive undertone
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Does not claim not settling into lines
The closest shade to Glossier Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage Very Deep 2 (Very deep · Olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Tower 28 Beauty Swipe Serum Non-Acnegenic Foundation in 20W Victorville, against Glossier Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage in Very Deep 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeVery Deep 2Closest shade match20W VictorvilleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall67
Colour60%64#584118#4b371eSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.8 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared68
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared72
Longevity30%8012-hour wear16-hour wearClose16-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100SensitiveSensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 70/100Shade match 67/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $7 more
