Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage Very Deep 2 dupes and alternatives Glossier
4.1 (490)·Very deep · Olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Ranked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
68
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: deep with warm neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than olive undertone
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
68
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same olive undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
64
Skin suitability
68
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: level-one dark with an olive undertone
Matches: Same olive undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: D7 - very deep with neutral undertones and an olive tone
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim 16-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
64
Skin suitability
68
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: level-one dark with a neutral undertone
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim 16-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
64
Skin suitability
68
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: level-three dark with a warm undertone
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim 16-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
68
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with warm, yellow undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
68
Visibly different colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with warm terra cotta undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
68
Visibly different colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with neutral golden undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
68
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: dark brown with neutral undertones
The closest shade to Glossier Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage Very Deep 2 (Very deep · Olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
J.Cat Beauty Aquasurance Compact Foundation in Espresso, against Glossier Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage in Very Deep 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeVery Deep 2Closest matchEspressoHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour60%—not comparable#584118No swatchNot comparedNo swatch colour on one side
Coverage30%60MediumFullSome differenceFull coverage rather than medium
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared59
Longevity30%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50SensitiveNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 72/100Shade match 80/100Low confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $4 more
Sephora
