Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 54 Medium Dark dupes and alternatives Jane Iredale
4.3 (618)·Deep tan · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$48 less (86%)4.5 (40,486)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very tan with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium Deep with Neutral Undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium with golden undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same buildable coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same buildable coverage
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium to deep skin with neutral undertones
The closest shade to Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 54 Medium Dark (Deep tan · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Hourglass Illusion Luminous Glow Foundation SPF 30 in 20.5, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 54 Medium Dark. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade54 Medium DarkClosest shade match20.5How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#a76e48#a26e4aLooks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Overall match 83/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Makeup By Mario SurrealSkin Luminous Hydrating Foundation in 20N, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 54 Medium Dark. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade54 Medium DarkClosest overall alternative20NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#a76e48#ab6a41Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Overall match 86/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.