A Really Good Foundation 111M dupes and alternatives KimChi Chic Beauty
4.6 (558)·Medium · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Ranked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for dry skin
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
92
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal skin · Contains drying alcohol
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$17.01 less (59%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (45%)4.0 (94)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
92
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
75
Looks identical · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal skin
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (45%)4.0 (94)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: light with warm gold undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
100
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
100
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
100
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
The closest shade to KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation 111M (Medium · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Revolution Beauty Superfix Blur Longwear Foundation in F6.2NC, against KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation in 111M. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade111MClosest matchF6.2NCHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%96#d19769#ce9869Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 0.1
Retailer descriptionLightFairSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 86/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $10 more
