Beautler.Your beauty butler

Skin Tint Blurring Elixir Foundation 10N dupes and alternatives Kylie Cosmetics

Rich deep · Neutral undertone

Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).

Only showing matches made for combination skin, with medium coverage, in liquid form.

  • 7 matches have no formulation listed and are not shown.
  • 2 matches have no skin type listed and are not shown.

Closest shade match: Fenty Beauty Soft'Lit Naturally Luminous Hydrating Longwear Foundation 498

The equivalent shade: scored on colour, depth and undertone only.

Your shade
Kylie Cosmetics
10NChange shade
Depth and undertone: Rich deep · Neutral
Finish and coverage: Natural · Light coverage
The match
Fenty Beauty
498
Depth and undertone: Rich deep · Neutral
Finish and coverage: Natural · Medium coverage
Shade match
93out of 100
Colour
88
Depth
100
Undertone
100
Medium confidence· Digital matchWhy it matches
Best price
$44SephoraSephora
Costs $9 more

Your shade $35 at Ulta Beauty

SephoraView at Sephora

Closest overall alternative: Hourglass Ambient Soft Glow Foundation 17.5

The most similar foundation overall: shade match 55%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, skin suitability 5%.

Your shade
Kylie Cosmetics
10NChange shade
Depth and undertone: Rich deep · Neutral
Finish and coverage: Natural · Light coverage
The match
Hourglass
17.5
Depth and undertone: Rich deep · Neutral
Finish and coverage: Natural · Medium coverage
Overall match
83out of 100
Shade (Shade match)
91
Finish (Finish & visual result)
82
Wear (Wear & performance)
61
Skin (Skin suitability)
76
Best price
$60SephoraSephora
Costs $25 more

Your shade $35 at Ulta Beauty

SephoraView at Sephora

More matches

Show
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.

Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.

  1. Shade match 84
    $44SephoraSephoraCosts $9 more

    Matches: Same neutral undertoneSame natural finishBoth claim a skin-like finish

    Differences: Medium rather than light coverageNo long-wear claimDoes not claim not settling into lines

    Score details
    Shade match
    84
    Finish & visual result
    94
    Wear & performance
    54
    Skin suitability
    87

    Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines

    Retailer shade note: deep

    Medium confidence· Digital match

    View match
  2. #4 · Makeup By Mario

    SurrealSkin Natural Finish Foundation

    30 W
    Shade match 78
    $48SephoraSephoraCosts $13 more

    Matches: Same natural finishBoth claim a skin-like finishBoth claim a blurring effect

    Differences: Slightly warmer undertoneMedium rather than light coverageDoes not claim not settling into lines

    Score details
    Shade match
    78
    Finish & visual result
    94
    Wear & performance
    68
    Skin suitability
    87

    Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol

    Retailer shade note: dark deep with warm undertone

    Medium confidence· Digital match

    View match
  3. Shade match 81
    $49SephoraSephoraCosts $14 more

    Matches: Same neutral undertoneSame natural finishBoth claim a blurring effect

    Differences: Medium rather than light coverageNo skin-like finish claimedDoes not claim not settling into lines

    Score details
    Shade match
    81
    Finish & visual result
    82
    Wear & performance
    68
    Skin suitability
    87

    Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol

    Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with neutral undertones

    Medium confidence· Digital match

    View match
  4. #6 · Hourglass

    Ambient Soft Glow Foundation

    16.5
    Shade match 82
    $60SephoraSephoraCosts $25 more

    Matches: Same neutral undertoneSame natural finishBoth claim a blurring effect

    Differences: Medium rather than light coverageNo skin-like finish claimedDoes not claim not settling into lines

    Score details
    Shade match
    82
    Finish & visual result
    82
    Wear & performance
    61
    Skin suitability
    76

    Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines

    Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral undertones

    Medium confidence· Digital match

    View match
  5. Shade match 82
    $58SephoraSephoraCosts $23 more

    Matches: Same neutral undertoneBoth claim a skin-like finishBoth claim a blurring effect

    Differences: Radiant rather than natural finishMedium rather than light coverageDoes not claim not settling into lines

    Score details
    Shade match
    82
    Finish & visual result
    79
    Wear & performance
    59
    Skin suitability
    87

    Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel

    Retailer shade note: deep with rich neutral undertones

    Medium confidence· Digital match

    View match
  6. Shade match 83
    $48SephoraSephoraCosts $13 more

    Matches: Very close colourSame natural finishClaims colour stability

    Differences: Slightly warmer undertoneMedium rather than light coverageNo skin-like finish claimed

    Score details
    Shade match
    83
    Finish & visual result
    73
    Wear & performance
    63
    Skin suitability
    87

    Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines

    Retailer shade note: dark deep with warm undertone

    Medium confidence· Digital match

    View match
  7. Shade match 83
    $40SephoraSephoraCosts $5 more

    Matches: Same neutral undertoneBoth claim a blurring effectClaims transfer resistance

    Differences: Matte rather than natural finishMedium rather than light coverageNo skin-like finish claimed

    Score details
    Shade match
    83
    Finish & visual result
    67
    Wear & performance
    61
    Skin suitability
    87

    Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol

    Retailer shade note: deep neutral

    Medium confidence· Digital match

    View match

Looking for a concealer in your shade?

The closest shade to Kylie Cosmetics Skin Tint Blurring Elixir Foundation 10N (Rich deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.

Closest concealers

  1. Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Long-Wear Blur Concealer

    17 Deep

    Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Long-Wear Blur Concealer, shade 17 Deep

    • Very close colour
    • Rich deep · Neutral undertone

    $36

  2. CoverGirl TruBlend Undercover Concealer

    Espresso

    CoverGirl TruBlend Undercover Concealer, shade Espresso

    • Very close colour
    • Rich deep · Neutral undertone

    $11.99

  3. Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place 24-Hour Concealer

    9N

    Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place 24-Hour Concealer, shade 9N

    • Close colour
    • Rich deep · Neutral undertone

    $38

  4. Laura Mercier Real Flawless Weightless Perfecting Serum Concealer

    6N1

    Laura Mercier Real Flawless Weightless Perfecting Serum Concealer, shade 6N1

    • Close colour
    • Rich deep · Neutral undertone

    $34

  5. Maybelline Instant Age Rewind Eraser Dark Circle Treatment Concealer

    190

    Maybelline Instant Age Rewind Eraser Dark Circle Treatment Concealer, shade 190

    • Close colour
    • Rich deep · Neutral undertone

    $12.99

  6. Too Faced Born This Way Super Coverage Multi-Use Concealer

    Ganache

    Too Faced Born This Way Super Coverage Multi-Use Concealer, shade Ganache

    • Close colour
    • Rich deep · Neutral undertone

    $36

Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.

Why the closest shade match works

Fenty Beauty Soft'Lit Naturally Luminous Hydrating Longwear Foundation in 498, against Kylie Cosmetics Skin Tint Blurring Elixir Foundation in 10N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.

ComparedYour shade10NClosest shade match498Score
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour88#3e2618#45291dVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth100Rich deepRich deepSameDepth difference: 0.0
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Undertone100NeutralNeutralSamefrom retailer shade descriptions
Finish & visual result25% of overall73
Finish100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage80LightMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared51
Longevity7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stabilitynot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall87
Skin type87Combination, normalNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for combination/​normal skin
Overall match 81/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match

Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.

How scoring works

If you switch

To Fenty Beauty Soft'Lit Naturally Luminous Hydrating Longwear Foundation in 498.

Same or better

  • Very close colour
  • Same neutral undertone
  • Same natural finish
  • Medium rather than light coverage
  • Claims transfer resistance

Different

  • No skin-like finish claimed
  • No blurring effect claimed
  • Does not claim not settling into lines
  • Does not claim a lightweight feel

Ingredients (information only, not scored)

9 shared ingredients; weighted similarity 24%. Ingredients only affect results through the filters.

AttributeYour shadeClosest shade match
BaseWater-based, high siliconeWater-based, high silicone
FragranceNot listedNot listed
Drying alcoholNot listedNot listed
SPFNot listedNot listed
OverlapBoth water-based; silicone high vs high

Why the closest overall alternative works

Hourglass Ambient Soft Glow Foundation in 17.5, against Kylie Cosmetics Skin Tint Blurring Elixir Foundation in 10N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.

ComparedYour shade10NClosest overall alternative17.5Score
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour86#3e2618#462f22Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth96Rich deepRich deepSameDepth difference: 2.5
Retailer descriptionDeepVery deepSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Undertone100NeutralNeutralSamefrom retailer shade descriptions
Finish & visual result25% of overall82
Finish100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage80LightMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared61
Longevity7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stabilitynot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall76
Skin type76Combination, normalNormal, dry, combination, oily, sensitiveBoth marketed for combination/​normal skin
Overall match 83/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match

Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.

How scoring works

If you switch

To Hourglass Ambient Soft Glow Foundation in 17.5.

Same or better

  • Very close colour
  • Same neutral undertone
  • Same natural finish
  • Medium rather than light coverage
  • Both claim a blurring effect
  • Claims transfer resistance
  • Both claim a lightweight feel

Different

  • No skin-like finish claimed
  • Does not claim not settling into lines

Ingredients (information only, not scored)

8 shared ingredients; weighted similarity 24%. Ingredients only affect results through the filters.

AttributeYour shadeClosest overall alternative
BaseWater-based, high siliconeWater-based, high silicone
FragranceNot listedNot listed
Drying alcoholNot listedNot listed
SPFNot listedNot listed
OverlapBoth water-based; silicone high vs high

Where to buy

Closest shade match

Fenty Beauty Soft'Lit Naturally Luminous Hydrating Longwear Foundation 498

Best price
$44SephoraSephora
Costs $9 more

Your shade $35 at Ulta Beauty

SephoraView at Sephora

Closest overall alternative

Hourglass Ambient Soft Glow Foundation 17.5

Best price
$60SephoraSephora
Costs $25 more

Your shade $35 at Ulta Beauty

SephoraView at Sephora

How these matches are scored

30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.

Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.