Skin Tint Blurring Elixir Foundation 2W dupes and alternatives Kylie Cosmetics
4.5 (1,573)·Fair · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
87
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: fair to medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
87
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
87
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for fair to light skin with yellow undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
87
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: Very Fair, warm neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
43
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 37% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: very fair with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
87
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
76
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
87
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: Very Fair, neutral undertones
The closest shade to Kylie Cosmetics Skin Tint Blurring Elixir Foundation 2W (Fair · Warm · peach undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Jung Saem Mool Essential Skin Nuder Long-Lasting Hydrating Compact Cushion Foundation in 20W Light Nude, against Kylie Cosmetics Skin Tint Blurring Elixir Foundation in 2W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade2WClosest shade match20W Light NudeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%98#edc8ab#f0caaeLooks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98FairFairSameDepth difference: 1.1
Retailer descriptionFairLightSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Coverage30%80LightMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0Combination, normalDryMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 83/100Shade match 98/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Glossier Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage in Very Light 1, against Kylie Cosmetics Skin Tint Blurring Elixir Foundation in 2W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade2WClosest overall alternativeVery Light 1How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%98#edc8ab#edc6a8Looks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99FairFairSameDepth difference: 0.8
Retailer descriptionFairNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0Combination, normalSensitiveMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 86/100Shade match 90/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $3 more
