Infallible Cushion Foundation 410 Cool dupes and alternatives L'Oréal Paris
4.3 (275)·Very deep · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Ranked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep skin with cool undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.99 less (60%)2.4 (5)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: dark or deep skin tones with red undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with brick red undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with true red undertones
The closest shade to L'Oréal Paris Infallible Cushion Foundation 410 Cool (Very deep · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Monika Blunder Beauty Blunder Cover Foundation/Concealer in Shade: 8 - ACHT, against L'Oréal Paris Infallible Cushion Foundation in 410 Cool. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade410 CoolClosest shade matchShade: 8 - ACHTHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%78#843118#763421Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Finish35%12MatteRadiantDifferentRadiant finish rather than matte
Coverage30%80BuildableFullCloseFull coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared61
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 73/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ONE/SIZE Turn Up the Base Full Beat Waterproof Liquid Foundation in Dark Deep 55 R, against L'Oréal Paris Infallible Cushion Foundation in 410 Cool. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade410 CoolClosest overall alternativeDark Deep 55 RHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%75#843118#813e2bClose colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%80BuildableFullCloseFull coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall20
Skin type100%20Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 78/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $20.01 more
