Infallible 32H Fresh Wear Foundation 515 Copper dupes and alternatives L'Oréal Paris
4.4 (40,035)·Deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: dark medium to deep - neutral
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very tan with pink undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium to deep - neutral, slightly warm
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very tan with yellow undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim colour stability· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium dark with cool undertone
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: richest tan with golden undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
The closest shade to L'Oréal Paris Infallible 32H Fresh Wear Foundation 515 Copper (Deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Hung Vanngo Beauty Red Carpet Skin Luminous Longwear Serum Foundation in 24, against L'Oréal Paris Infallible 32H Fresh Wear Foundation in 515 Copper. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade515 CopperClosest match24How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%88#a04b1f#984815Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 2.9
Retailer descriptionNot statedMedium tanNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 83/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.