Beautler.Your beauty butler

Studio Radiance Serum Powered Foundation NW58 dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics

Very deep · Neutral undertone

Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).

Only showing matches with full coverage, in liquid form.

  • 8 matches have no formulation listed and are not shown.

Closest shade match: Jane Iredale Beyond Matte Liquid Foundation M18

The equivalent shade: scored on colour, depth and undertone only.

The match
Jane Iredale
M18
Depth and undertone: Very deep · Neutral
Finish and coverage: Matte · Full coverage
Shade match
89out of 100
Colour
84
Depth
92
Undertone
100
Medium confidence· Digital matchWhy it matches
Match price
$54Ulta BeautyUlta Beauty
Costs $8 more

Your shade $46 at Ulta Beauty · product price; shade not separately priced

Closest overall alternative: Drunk Elephant Kamo Triple-Peptide Multi-Use Serum Foundation Rich 23C

The most similar foundation overall: shade match 55%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, skin suitability 5%.

The match
Drunk Elephant
Rich 23C
Depth and undertone: Very deep · Neutral · neutral pink
Finish and coverage: Natural · Full coverage
Overall match
79out of 100
Shade (Shade match)
88
Finish (Finish & visual result)
64
Wear (Wear & performance)
75
Skin (Skin suitability)
60
Best price
$42SephoraSephora
$4 less (9%)

Your shade $46 at Ulta Beauty

More matches

Show
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.

Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.

  1. #3 · Drunk Elephant

    Kamo Triple-Peptide Multi-Use Serum Foundation

    Rich 22N
    Shade match 88
    $42SephoraSephora$4 less (9%)

    Matches: Same neutral undertoneSame full coverageClaims a skin-like finish

    Differences: Natural rather than radiant finishNo blurring effect claimedDoes not claim not settling into lines

    Score details
    Shade match
    88
    Finish & visual result
    64
    Wear & performance
    75
    Skin suitability
    60

    Close colour · Natural · Full coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin

    Retailer shade note: Rich with Neutral Undertones

    Medium confidence· Digital match

    View match
  2. #4 · Drunk Elephant

    Kamo Triple-Peptide Multi-Use Serum Foundation

    Rich 24N
    Shade match 87
    $42SephoraSephora$4 less (9%)

    Matches: Very close colourSame neutral undertoneSame full coverage

    Differences: Natural rather than radiant finishNo blurring effect claimedDoes not claim not settling into lines

    Score details
    Shade match
    87
    Finish & visual result
    64
    Wear & performance
    75
    Skin suitability
    60

    Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin

    Retailer shade note: Very Rich with Warm Neutral Undertones

    Medium confidence· Digital match

    View match
  3. Shade match 83
    $55SephoraSephoraCosts $9 more

    Matches: Same neutral undertoneSame full coverageBoth claim 16-hour wear

    Differences: Natural rather than radiant finishNo blurring effect claimedDoes not claim not settling into lines

    Score details
    Shade match
    83
    Finish & visual result
    70
    Wear & performance
    79
    Skin suitability
    60

    Close colour · Natural · Full coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin

    Retailer shade note: D7.5 - Very rich deep with neutral undertones, and a red tone

    High confidence· Digital match

    View match
  4. Shade match 74
    $63Ulta BeautyUlta Beauty(product price)Costs $17 more

    Matches: Same full coverageBoth claim transfer resistanceBoth claim a lightweight feel

    Differences: Luminous rather than radiant finishNo blurring effect claimedDoes not claim not settling into lines

    Score details
    Shade match
    74
    Finish & visual result
    79
    Wear & performance
    75
    Skin suitability
    100

    Close colour · Luminous · Full coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product

    Differences: Luminous rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines

    Medium confidence· Digital match

    View match
  5. Shade match 81
    $55SephoraSephoraCosts $9 more

    Matches: Same neutral undertoneSame full coverageBoth claim 16-hour wear

    Differences: Slightly lighterNatural rather than radiant finishNo blurring effect claimed

    Score details
    Shade match
    81
    Finish & visual result
    70
    Wear & performance
    79
    Skin suitability
    60

    Close colour · Natural · Full coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin

    Retailer shade note: D8 - Very rich deep with neutral undertones

    High confidence· Digital match

    View match
  6. #8 · Tarte

    Face Tape Full Coverage Foundation

    60H mahogany honey
    Shade match 78
    $42SephoraSephora$4 less (9%)

    Matches: Same full coverageBoth claim a blurring effectBoth claim 12-hour wear

    Differences: Slightly warmer undertoneMatte rather than radiant finishNot marketed for dry/sensitive skin

    Score details
    Shade match
    78
    Finish & visual result
    62
    Wear & performance
    100
    Skin suitability
    60

    Close colour · Matte · Full coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance

    Retailer shade note: very deep skin with warm, peach undertones

    High confidence· Digital match

    View match
  7. Shade match 81
    $39SephoraSephora$7 less (15%)

    Matches: Very close colourSame full coverageAdds SPF 50

    Differences: Slightly deeperSlightly cooler undertoneNatural rather than radiant finish

    Score details
    Shade match
    81
    Finish & visual result
    70
    Wear & performance
    51
    Skin suitability
    100

    Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance

    Retailer shade note: very deep complexion with cool rosy undertones

    Medium confidence· Digital match

    View match

Looking for a concealer in your shade?

The closest shade to MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Serum Powered Foundation NW58 (Very deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.

Closest concealers

  1. Tarte Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer

    61H espresso

    Tarte Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer, shade 61H espresso

    • Very close colour
    • Very deep · Warm · peach undertone

    $32

  2. Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer

    Clove 11.4

    Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer, shade Clove 11.4

    • Slight colour difference
    • Very deep · Neutral undertone

    $39

  3. Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Instant Retouch Longwear Liquid Concealer

    498

    Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Instant Retouch Longwear Liquid Concealer, shade 498

    • Slight colour difference
    • Deep · Neutral undertone

    $30

  4. Maybelline Instant Age Rewind Eraser Dark Circle Treatment Concealer

    175

    Maybelline Instant Age Rewind Eraser Dark Circle Treatment Concealer, shade 175

    • Slight colour difference
    • Rich deep · Neutral · neutral pink undertone

    $12.99

  5. Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place 24-Hour Concealer

    7N

    Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place 24-Hour Concealer, shade 7N

    • Slight colour difference
    • Very deep · Neutral undertone

    $38

  6. Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer

    17.75 Deep

    Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer, shade 17.75 Deep

    • Slight colour difference
    • Rich deep · Neutral undertone

    $36

Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.

Why the closest shade match works

Jane Iredale Beyond Matte Liquid Foundation in M18, against MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Serum Powered Foundation in NW58. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.

ComparedYour shadeNW58Closest shade matchM18Score
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour84#6c3932#714135Close colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth92Very deepVery deepSameDepth difference: 3.9
Retailer descriptionRich deepRich deepBoth described as rich deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Undertone100NeutralNeutralSamefrom retailer shade descriptions
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared62
Finish12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finishnot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared61
Longevity7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stabilitynot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type60Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveCombination, normal, oilyBoth marketed for combination/​normal/​oily skin
Overall match 77/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match

Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.

How scoring works

If you switch

To Jane Iredale Beyond Matte Liquid Foundation in M18.

Same or better

  • Same neutral undertone
  • Same full coverage
  • Both claim a blurring effect
  • Both claim a lightweight feel

Different

  • Small colour difference on the swatch
  • Matte finish instead of radiant
  • Does not claim transfer resistance
  • Does not claim not settling into lines
  • Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin

Ingredients (information only, not scored)

4 shared ingredients; weighted similarity 10%. Ingredients only affect results through the filters.

AttributeYour shadeClosest shade match
BaseWater-based, high siliconeWater-based, high silicone
FragranceNot listedNot listed
Drying alcoholNot listedNot listed
SPFNot listedNot listed
OverlapBoth water-based; silicone high vs high

Why the closest overall alternative works

Drunk Elephant Kamo Triple-Peptide Multi-Use Serum Foundation in Rich 23C, against MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Serum Powered Foundation in NW58. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.

ComparedYour shadeNW58Closest overall alternativeRich 23CScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour88#6c3932#653329Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth92Very deepVery deepSameDepth difference: 3.9
Retailer descriptionRich deepRich deepBoth described as rich deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Undertone85NeutralNeutral · neutral pinkClosefrom retailer shade descriptions
Finish & visual result25% of overall64
Finish56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared75
Longevity10012-hour wear12-hour wearSameBoth claim 12-hour wear
Transfer resistance100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stabilitynot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type60Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for dry/​normal/​oily skin
Overall match 79/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match

Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.

How scoring works

If you switch

To Drunk Elephant Kamo Triple-Peptide Multi-Use Serum Foundation in Rich 23C.

Same or better

  • $4 less
  • Very close colour
  • Same neutral undertone
  • Same full coverage
  • Claims a skin-like finish
  • Both claim 12-hour wear
  • Both claim transfer resistance

Different

  • Natural finish instead of radiant
  • No blurring effect claimed
  • Does not claim not settling into lines
  • Does not claim a lightweight feel
  • Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin

Ingredients (information only, not scored)

7 shared ingredients; weighted similarity 13%. Ingredients only affect results through the filters.

AttributeYour shadeClosest overall alternative
BaseWater-based, high siliconeWater-based, no silicone
FragranceNot listedNot listed
Drying alcoholNot listedNot listed
SPFNot listedNot listed
OverlapBoth water-based; silicone high vs none

Where to buy

Closest shade match

Jane Iredale Beyond Matte Liquid Foundation M18

Match price
$54Ulta BeautyUlta Beauty
Costs $8 more

Your shade $46 at Ulta Beauty · product price; shade not separately priced

Closest overall alternative

Drunk Elephant Kamo Triple-Peptide Multi-Use Serum Foundation Rich 23C

Best price
$42SephoraSephora
$4 less (9%)

Your shade $46 at Ulta Beauty

How these matches are scored

30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.

Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.