Studio Radiance Skin Tint Stick RICH 3 dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (607)·Rich deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep rich with neutral undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than radiant finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
87
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
76
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
87
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: D8 - very rich deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: ultra deep skin with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
24
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with very warm, rosy undertones
The closest shade to MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Skin Tint Stick RICH 3 (Rich deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Anastasia Beverly Hills Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation in 11N, against MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Skin Tint Stick in RICH 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRICH 3Closest shade match11NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%80#332424#3f2f30Close colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%20LightFullDifferentFull coverage rather than light
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared52
Longevity30%3524-hour wear12-hour wearDifferent12-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall40
Skin type100%40Normal, dryNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 67/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Sephora Collection Best Skin Ever Liquid Foundation in 40N, against MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Skin Tint Stick in RICH 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRICH 3Closest overall alternative40NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%77#332424#3f292bClose colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared61
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%80LightMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared65
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall87
Skin type100%87Normal, dryNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 77/100Shade match 86/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $11 more
