Studio Radiance Skin Tint Stick RICH 3 dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (607)·Rich deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal skin
Retailer shade note: coffee - rich brown skin with neutral undertones
$6.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$31.01 less (82%)3.8 (142)
Matches: Same neutral undertone
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
76
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
76
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
The closest shade to MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Skin Tint Stick RICH 3 (Rich deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Essence Foundation Stick in 400, against MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Skin Tint Stick in RICH 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRICH 3Closest shade match400How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%92#332424#37292bVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Overall match 68/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Unreal Skin Sheer Glow Tint Hydrating Foundation Stick in 17 Deep, against MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Skin Tint Stick in RICH 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRICH 3Closest overall alternative17 DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall73
Colour60%56#332424#482c28Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.7 (0 is identical)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared51
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall87
Skin type100%87Normal, dryNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 75/100Shade match 73/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.