Radiant Creamy Concealer Crema Catalina dupes and alternatives NARS
4.5 (22,453)·Fair · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium with golden undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Described as fair, yours as medium· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium-full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as fair, yours as medium · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium-full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as fair, yours as medium
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Described as very fair, yours as medium· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium-full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as very fair, yours as medium · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium-full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fairest with pink/neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as very fair, yours as medium
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly deeper· Described as fair, yours as medium· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Described as fair, yours as medium · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: fair with neutral undertone
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as fair, yours as medium
The closest shade to NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer Crema Catalina (Fair · Cool undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Glossier Stretch Concealer for Dewy Buildable Coverage in Light 4, against NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer in Crema Catalina. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCrema CatalinaClosest matchLight 4How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#f1caa8#f7cba5Very close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98FairFairSameDepth difference: 1.1
Retailer descriptionMediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared89
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%100MediumBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared65
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Normal, dry, combinationNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $25 more
View at Walmart
