Radiant Creamy Concealer Crema Catalina dupes and alternatives NARS
4.5 (22,453)·Fair · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium with golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
83
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Described as light, yours as medium· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Described as light, yours as medium · Slightly warmer undertone · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: light with warm olive undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light, yours as medium
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Described as light medium, yours as medium· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Described as light medium, yours as medium · Slightly warmer undertone · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: light medium with warm golden undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light medium, yours as medium
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Described as fair, yours as medium· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Described as fair, yours as medium · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: Fair, Warm Golden
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as fair, yours as medium
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Described as fair, yours as medium· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Described as fair, yours as medium · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: fair with warm neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as fair, yours as medium
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Described as very fair, yours as medium· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as very fair, yours as medium · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: Very Fair, Neutral
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as very fair, yours as medium
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Described as fair, yours as medium· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as fair, yours as medium · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: Fair, Neutral
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as fair, yours as medium
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Described as very fair, yours as medium· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as very fair, yours as medium · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: very fair with warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as very fair, yours as medium
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Described as fair, yours as medium· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as fair, yours as medium · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: Fair, Neutral
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as fair, yours as medium
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Described as fair, yours as medium· Slightly warmer undertone· Satin rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as fair, yours as medium · Slightly warmer undertone · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: fair with yellow undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as fair, yours as medium
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (53%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Described as fair, yours as medium· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Satin rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as fair, yours as medium · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: fair with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as fair, yours as medium
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Described as fair, yours as medium· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium-full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as fair, yours as medium · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium-full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as fair, yours as medium
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Described as very fair, yours as medium· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium-full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as very fair, yours as medium · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium-full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fairest with pink/neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as very fair, yours as medium
The closest shade to NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer Crema Catalina (Fair · Cool undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
NARS Soft Matte Complete Concealer in Crema Catalana, against NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer in Crema Catalina. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCrema CatalinaClosest matchCrema CatalanaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#f1caa8#f8caa8Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99FairFairSameDepth difference: 0.9
Retailer descriptionMediumMediumBoth described as mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared62
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared74
Longevity30%8016-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 81/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.