Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer 53N deep dupes and alternatives Tarte
4.5 (38,566)·Tan · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
83
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: D3 - deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Described as medium tan, yours as deep· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
88
Skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Described as medium tan, yours as deep · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than full coverage
Retailer shade note: MD3 - Medium-deep to deep with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as deep
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Described as medium tan, yours as deep· Olive rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
88
Skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Described as medium tan, yours as deep · Olive rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than full coverage
Retailer shade note: MD2.6 - Medium-deep with warm undertones, and an olive tone
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as deep
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
45
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
The closest shade to Tarte Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer 53N deep (Tan · Cool undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in CN 126 Espresso, against Tarte Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer in 53N deep. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade53N deepClosest matchCN 126 EspressoHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%81#9f7866#996f5fClose colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90TanDeep tanCloseDepth difference: 4.5
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared66
Finish35%56MatteNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than matte
Coverage30%60FullMediumSome differenceMedium coverage rather than full
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, combination, oilyNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for normal/oily skin
Overall match 73/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $4 more
