Perfect Canvas Foundation 17N/W Java dupes and alternatives Temptu
Rich deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: ultra deep with deep-neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: dark deep with warm undertone
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (29%)4.3 (49)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: dark deep with warm undertone
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (29%)4.3 (49)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$15.01 less (44%)4.4 (40,035)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Claims colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation 17N/W Java (Rich deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Fenty Beauty Soft'Lit Naturally Luminous Hydrating Longwear Foundation in 498, against Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation in 17N/W Java. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade17N/W JavaClosest shade match498How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#44271f#45291dVery close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared77
Finish35%78Natural matteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared86
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, combinationSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Refy Skin Base Hydrating Gel Skin Tint in 280N, against Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation in 17N/W Java. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade17N/W JavaClosest overall alternative280NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#44271f#4b281eVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared84
Finish35%78Natural matteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%80BuildableLightCloseLight coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, combination, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.