Perfect Canvas Foundation 17N/W Java dupes and alternatives Temptu
Rich deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Ranked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (29%)4.3 (49)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
$17.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$16.01 less (47%)4.2 (5,328)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
$17.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$16.01 less (47%)4.2 (5,328)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: very deep, neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (29%)4.3 (6,617)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: for the deepest darkest skin w/ a neutral undertone
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$15.01 less (44%)4.4 (40,035)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Claims colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation 17N/W Java (Rich deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Unleashia Satin Wear Healthy-Green Cushion Foundation in 51N Choco Fudge, against Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation in 17N/W Java. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade17N/W JavaClosest shade match51N Choco FudgeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%90#44271f#472c21Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared70
Finish35%78Natural matteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%80BuildableFullCloseFull coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Lawless Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation in 33D, against Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation in 17N/W Java. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade17N/W JavaClosest overall alternative33DHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%83#44271f#422422Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Finish35%78Natural matteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%80BuildableFullCloseFull coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (29%)
