Perfect Canvas Foundation 4.5C Bisque dupes and alternatives Temptu
Medium · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: light medium with cool undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation 4.5C Bisque (Medium · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris True Match Super-Blendable Foundation in C5 Cool Medium, against Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation in 4.5C Bisque. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade4.5C BisqueClosest shade matchC5 Cool MediumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%84#ca917e#d1977dClose colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 3.1
Retailer descriptionLight mediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared91
Finish35%78Natural matteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Medium Coverage Foundation in 400 Medium Deep, against Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation in 4.5C Bisque. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade4.5C BisqueClosest overall alternative400 Medium DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%82#ca917e#c6886fClose colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Finish35%78Natural matteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $18 more
