Perfect Canvas Foundation 5.5C Rose Beige dupes and alternatives Temptu
Tan · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$15.01 less (44%)4.1 (2,064)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim transfer resistance· Adds SPF 27
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium - deep with cool red undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertone
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Natural rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims colour stability· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertone
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: Medium with neutral golden undertones
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (53%)4.2 (561)
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: medium deep, golden bronze undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation 5.5C Rose Beige (Tan · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared77
Finish35%78Natural matteMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 77/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ColourPop Pretty Fresh Hyaluronic Hydrating Foundation in Dark 153C, against Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation in 5.5C Rose Beige. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade5.5C Rose BeigeClosest overall alternativeDark 153CHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%69#b97e6e#b18168Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.4
Retailer descriptionMediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared91
Finish35%78Natural matteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.