S/B Foundation 006 Toffee dupes and alternatives Temptu
Tan · Olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than luminous finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium shade with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than luminous finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural matte rather than luminous finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural matte rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: Medium/Tan with Neutral Undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than luminous finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: level-two medium with a neutral undertone
The closest shade to Temptu S/B Foundation 006 Toffee (Tan · Olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Gucci 24 Hour Full Coverage Luminous Matte Finish Foundation in 450O, against Temptu S/B Foundation in 006 Toffee. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade006 ToffeeClosest shade match450OHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#ae7852#b0774eLooks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.1
Retailer descriptionMediumMedium tanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish35%0LuminousMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than luminous
Coverage30%80BuildableFullCloseFull coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, combination, oilySkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Juvia's Place I Am My Skin Hydra-Tint Foundation Stick in 12 Addis Ababa, against Temptu S/B Foundation in 006 Toffee. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade006 ToffeeClosest overall alternative12 Addis AbabaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%88#ae7852#b67854Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98TanTanSameDepth difference: 1.4
Retailer descriptionMediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish35%34LuminousNaturalDifferentNatural finish rather than luminous
Coverage30%80BuildableFullCloseFull coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, normalSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.