S/B Foundation 008 Clay dupes and alternatives Temptu
Deep tan · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than luminous finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: Tan with strong golden undertones
$14.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$14.50 less (50%)4.5 (995)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than luminous finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium shade with neutral undertones
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (17%)4.3 (49)
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
Retailer shade note: medium-deep with neutral peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than luminous finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than luminous finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Contains listed fragrance
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$13.01 less (45%)4.2 (5,524)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than luminous finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than luminous finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: level-three medium with a neutral undertone
The closest shade to Temptu S/B Foundation 008 Clay (Deep tan · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Finish35%34LuminousNaturalDifferentNatural finish rather than luminous
Coverage30%80BuildableFullCloseFull coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared60
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormalSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Maybelline Super Stay 24H Skin Tint + Vitamin C in 368, against Temptu S/B Foundation in 008 Clay. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade008 ClayClosest overall alternative368How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%87#976145#935a3aVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94Deep tanDeepCloseDepth difference: 3.4
Retailer descriptionMedium tanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish35%78LuminousRadiantCloseRadiant finish rather than luminous
Coverage30%80BuildableFullCloseFull coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared80
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.