S/B Foundation 011 Dark Cocoa dupes and alternatives Temptu
Rich deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$15.01 less (52%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Described as deep, yours as medium tan· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Described as deep, yours as medium tan · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage
Retailer shade note: dark deep with warm undertone
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as deep, yours as medium tan
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Described as very deep, yours as medium tan· Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than luminous finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
80
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as very deep, yours as medium tan · Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as very deep, yours as medium tan
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Described as very deep, yours as medium tan· Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than luminous finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
80
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as very deep, yours as medium tan · Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as very deep, yours as medium tan
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Described as very deep, yours as medium tan· Radiant rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
80
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as very deep, yours as medium tan · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as very deep, yours as medium tan
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Described as very deep, yours as medium tan· Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as very deep, yours as medium tan · Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: extra deep with neutral cool undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as very deep, yours as medium tan
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Described as very deep, yours as medium tan· Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as very deep, yours as medium tan · Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: D7 - very deep with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as very deep, yours as medium tan
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as rich deep, yours as medium tan· Radiant rather than luminous finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as rich deep, yours as medium tan · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: Rich Neutral
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as rich deep, yours as medium tan
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Described as rich deep, yours as medium tan· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than luminous finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as rich deep, yours as medium tan · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: deep rich with warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as rich deep, yours as medium tan
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Described as rich deep, yours as medium tan· Natural rather than luminous finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Described as rich deep, yours as medium tan · Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: deep rich with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as rich deep, yours as medium tan
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Described as very deep, yours as medium tan· Radiant rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as very deep, yours as medium tan · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: very deep neutral
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as very deep, yours as medium tan
The closest shade to Temptu S/B Foundation 011 Dark Cocoa (Rich deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Fenty Beauty Soft'Lit Naturally Luminous Hydrating Longwear Foundation in 498, against Temptu S/B Foundation in 011 Dark Cocoa. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade011 Dark CocoaClosest shade match498How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%83#513126#45291dClose colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Finish35%34LuminousNaturalDifferentNatural finish rather than luminous
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, combinationSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 75/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Glossier Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage in Deep 5, against Temptu S/B Foundation in 011 Dark Cocoa. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade011 Dark CocoaClosest overall alternativeDeep 5How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%91#513126#503325Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Finish35%34LuminousNaturalDifferentNatural finish rather than luminous
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedSensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 77/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $5 more
