Silksphere Foundation 5.5C Rose Beige dupes and alternatives Temptu
Tan · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same full coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Matte rather than dewy finish
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Matte rather than dewy finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: light brown skin w/ pink undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Described as tan, yours as light medium
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Described as tan, yours as light medium · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than dewy finish · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: tan with rosy to neutral undertone for deeper tan skin
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as tan, yours as light medium
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Described as deep, yours as light medium· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than dewy finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as deep, yours as light medium · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than dewy finish · Medium rather than full coverage
Retailer shade note: Deep neutral with subtle warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as deep, yours as light medium
The closest shade to Temptu Silksphere Foundation 5.5C Rose Beige (Tan · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
PÜR 4-in-1 Love Your Selfie Longwear Foundation & Concealer in DP3 Caramel, against Temptu Silksphere Foundation in 5.5C Rose Beige. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade5.5C Rose BeigeClosest shade matchDP3 CaramelHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%79#b87d6f#bb836dClose colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96TanMedium tanCloseDepth difference: 2.6
Retailer descriptionLight mediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish35%0DewyMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than dewy
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared61
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 71/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Medium Coverage Foundation in 400 Medium Deep, against Temptu Silksphere Foundation in 5.5C Rose Beige. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade5.5C Rose BeigeClosest overall alternative400 Medium DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall77
Colour60%66#b87d6f#c6886fSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.5 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared54
Finish35%12DewyNaturalDifferentNatural finish rather than dewy
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 74/100Shade match 77/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $18 more
