Silksphere Foundation 5.5C Rose Beige dupes and alternatives Temptu
Tan · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than dewy finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than dewy finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (53%)4.3 (699)
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than dewy finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than dewy finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than dewy finish
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than dewy finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (53%)4.3 (699)
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than dewy finish
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than dewy finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than dewy finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Described as deep, yours as light medium· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than dewy finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as deep, yours as light medium · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than dewy finish · Medium rather than full coverage
Retailer shade note: Deep neutral with subtle warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as deep, yours as light medium
The closest shade to Temptu Silksphere Foundation 5.5C Rose Beige (Tan · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
ColourPop Pretty Fresh Hyaluronic Hydrating Foundation in Dark 153C, against Temptu Silksphere Foundation in 5.5C Rose Beige. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade5.5C Rose BeigeClosest shade matchDark 153CHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%64#b87d6f#b18168Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.1
Retailer descriptionLight mediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish35%12DewyNaturalDifferentNatural finish rather than dewy
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared60
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 65/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Medium Coverage Foundation in 400 Medium Deep, against Temptu Silksphere Foundation in 5.5C Rose Beige. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade5.5C Rose BeigeClosest overall alternative400 Medium DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall77
Colour60%66#b87d6f#c6886fSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.5 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared54
Finish35%12DewyNaturalDifferentNatural finish rather than dewy
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 74/100Shade match 77/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $18 more
