Silksphere Foundation 6.5N/C True Beige dupes and alternatives Temptu
Deep tan · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than dewy finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than dewy finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for deeper skin with yellow undertones
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (53%)4.3 (699)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than dewy finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than dewy finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (53%)4.2 (561)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than dewy finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than dewy finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (53%)4.2 (561)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than dewy finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than dewy finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to Temptu Silksphere Foundation 6.5N/C True Beige (Deep tan · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Dior Forever Natural Matte Velvet Compact Foundation in 6N, against Temptu Silksphere Foundation in 6.5N/C True Beige. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade6.5N/C True BeigeClosest match6NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#a9715a#a9765eVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep tanTanCloseDepth difference: 1.9
Retailer descriptionMediumMedium tanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared38
Finish35%0DewyMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than dewy
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, oilySkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 74/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $8 more
