Silksphere Foundation 6.5N/C True Beige dupes and alternatives Temptu
Deep tan · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (53%)4.3 (699)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than dewy finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than dewy finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$22Ulta Beauty(product price)$12 less (35%)3.5 (42)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Natural rather than dewy finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (53%)4.2 (561)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than dewy finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than dewy finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (53%)4.2 (561)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than dewy finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than dewy finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to Temptu Silksphere Foundation 6.5N/C True Beige (Deep tan · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Laura Mercier Tinted Blur Balm Skin Tint in Shade 05, against Temptu Silksphere Foundation in 6.5N/C True Beige. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade6.5N/C True BeigeClosest shade matchShade 05How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%95#a9715a#ab7156Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep tanTanCloseDepth difference: 0.3
Retailer descriptionMediumMedium tanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared34
Finish35%0DewyMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than dewy
Coverage30%40FullLightDifferentLight coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared70
Longevity30%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims colour stability (no oxidation); your product does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, combination, oilySkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 73/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Tarte CC color-correcting tinted serum in Rich, against Temptu Silksphere Foundation in 6.5N/C True Beige. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade6.5N/C True BeigeClosest overall alternativeRichHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%75#a9715a#a2674aClose colourColour difference 4.2 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared54
Finish35%12DewyNaturalDifferentNatural finish rather than dewy
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared80
Longevity30%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, combinationSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 74/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$22 less (65%)
