Architecture Soft Matte 24H Multi-Use Foundation Stick 19.0W Macassar dupes and alternatives Tom Ford
4.9 (11)·Deep · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: Very deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry skin
Matches: Same matte finish· Same medium coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal skin
Retailer shade note: extra deep with cool red undertones
The closest shade to Tom Ford Architecture Soft Matte 24H Multi-Use Foundation Stick 19.0W Macassar (Deep · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Make Up For Ever HD Skin Hydra Glow Hydrating Foundation in 4N68 - Coffee, against Tom Ford Architecture Soft Matte 24H Multi-Use Foundation Stick in 19.0W Macassar. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade19.0W MacassarClosest shade match4N68 - CoffeeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%83#945742#8d5d49Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 1.0
Retailer descriptionRich deepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish35%12MatteRadiantDifferentRadiant finish rather than matte
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Overall match 72/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ColourPop Pretty Fresh Hyaluronic Hydrating Foundation in Deep Dark 205N, against Tom Ford Architecture Soft Matte 24H Multi-Use Foundation Stick in 19.0W Macassar. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade19.0W MacassarClosest overall alternativeDeep Dark 205NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%78#945742#8f5f4fClose colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 2.2
Retailer descriptionRich deepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 74/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$10 less (17%)
