Eyeshadow Singles Coconut dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (2,863)·Nude · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the shade match: colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Ranked by the shade match: colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
36
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Silver rather than nude· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than nude · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Sugarfrost, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Coconut. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCoconutClosest shade matchSugarfrostHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%83#dcbd9e#ddc1abClose colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightMediumCloseDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall31
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Not listed24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 65/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Color Snack Eyeshadow Duo in Peanut Butter Crunch, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Coconut. Matched on the lighter eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCoconutClosest overall alternativePeanut Butter CrunchHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%71#dcbd9e#dec8b4Close colourColour difference 4.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%89LightLightSameDepth difference 4.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall48
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Overall match 67/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $16 more
