Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$27.01 less (69%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim 12-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
30
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Olive rather than neutral undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Deep with neutral olive undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· Adds SPF 40
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep complexion with cool rosy undertones
Matches: Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
87
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal/dry skin
The closest shade to Yepoda The Dewy Day 6N (Deep tan · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Benefit Cosmetics The POREfessional Blurring & Smoothing Foundation in 33N Marvelous, against Yepoda The Dewy Day in 6N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade6NClosest shade match33N MarvelousHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%94#987760#9a755aVery close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared57
Longevity30%3512-hour wear24-hour wearDifferent24-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall28
Skin type100%28Normal, dry, sensitiveNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 78/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kosas Revealer Skin-Improving Foundation SPF 25 in Deep Neutral Warm 410, against Yepoda The Dewy Day in 6N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade6NClosest overall alternativeDeep Neutral Warm 410How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall75
Colour60%65#987760#aa7860Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94Deep tanTanCloseDepth difference: 3.2
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared80
Longevity30%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, sensitiveNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 79/100Shade match 75/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.