Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same natural finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
33
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Deep neutral with subtle warm undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry skin
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (59%)4.2 (561)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
33
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Olive rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
57
Skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Olive rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
87
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (59%)4.3 (699)
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to Yepoda The Dewy Day 7W (Tan · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Givenchy Prisme Libre Glow Serum Blurring Foundation in 6.8N, against Yepoda The Dewy Day in 7W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade7WClosest shade match6.8NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%86#967c73#9d847bVery close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91TanTanSameDepth difference: 4.3
Retailer descriptionDeepVery deepSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared57
Longevity30%3512-hour wear24-hour wearDifferent24-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, sensitiveNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 76/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kosas Revealer Skin-Improving Foundation SPF 25 in Deep Neutral Olive 400, against Yepoda The Dewy Day in 7W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade7WClosest overall alternativeDeep Neutral Olive 400How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall77
Colour60%79#967c73#947369Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92TanDeep tanCloseDepth difference: 4.0
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared80
Longevity30%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, sensitiveNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 77/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$27 less (69%)
