Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation 4WP dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.4 (4,961)·Medium tan · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertone
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertone
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
$39Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (20%)4.3 (1,754)
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very intense dark-medium shade, neutral undertone
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same matte finish
Differences: Sheer rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
49
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Sheer coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
The closest shade to Anastasia Beverly Hills Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation 4WP (Medium tan · Warm · peach undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
ColourPop Pretty Fresh Hyaluronic Hydrating Foundation in Dark 175W, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation in 4WP. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade4WPClosest matchDark 175WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#b3896d#b1856bVery close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 82/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $11 more
Target
