Matte Contour and Sculpt Cream Bronzer Deep Tan dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.6 (1,632)·Brown · Neutral · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar contour overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: contour for medium deep skin tones, cool undertone
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Does not claim transfer resistance· Dry rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
96
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Does not claim transfer resistance · Dry rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Bronze rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Bronze rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Deeper· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
96
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: shadow for light medium to medium deep skin tones of all undertones
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Does not claim transfer resistance· Normal rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Normal rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
63
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Retailer shade note: deep skin tones, neutral undertones
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (77%)4.6 (16,298)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: light-medium to medium-tan skin tones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Retailer shade note: very deep bronze with neutral undertones
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Use as contour: possible
Retailer shade note: medium-deep with warm undertones
Westman Atelier Face Trace Cream Contour Stick in Whiskey, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Matte Contour and Sculpt Cream Bronzer in Deep Tan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep TanClosest shade matchWhiskeyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour50%86#79402c#744229Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth25%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%60Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for combination, dry, normal skin
Overall match 79/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Soft Focus Cream-to-Powder Contour Stick in Medium Neutral, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Matte Contour and Sculpt Cream Bronzer in Deep Tan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep TanClosest overall alternativeMedium NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour50%79#79402c#844124Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth25%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.6 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared60
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%20Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveDryDifferentBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 82/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$1 less (3%)
