Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer 14 dupes and alternatives Armani Beauty
4.4 (2,347)·Deep · Olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral to golden undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than olive undertone· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than olive undertone · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: extra deep with neutral undertones
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Luminous rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: for very deep cool skin with a red hue
Matches: Same olive undertone· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral olive undertones
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
45
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$10.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$31.01 less (74%)4.1 (2,823)
Matches: Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 32% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
The closest shade to Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer 14 (Deep · Olive undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
IT Cosmetics Bye Bye Under Eye Full Coverage Anti-Aging Water-Resistant Concealer in 44.0 Deep Natural, against Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer in 14. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade14Closest shade match44.0 Deep NaturalHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%96#805846#825b4aLooks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 1.6
Retailer descriptionVery deepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%60MediumFullSome differenceFull coverage rather than medium
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, combination, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 75/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kosas Revealer Super Creamy + Brightening Concealer in Tone 10.5 N, against Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer in 14. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade14Closest overall alternativeTone 10.5 NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%89#805846#7c5243Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 3.0
Retailer descriptionVery deepRich deepSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, combinationSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$18 less (43%)
View at Walmart
